Skip to main content

BIR voices export restriction concerns at OECD conference

Global – The growing global demand for primary and secondary raw materials has led to an increase in related export restrictions. Indeed, up to one-third of World Trade Organization (WTO) members have restrictions in place, it emerges in a new OECD publication entitled ‘€˜Export Restrictions in Raw Materials Trade: Facts, fallacies and better practices’€™. The publication was launched during the early-November OECD Conference on Trade in Raw Materials, held in Paris.

Of interest to recycling companies concerned with export restrictions, the OECD book has chapters covering the following areas: recent developments in the use of export restrictions in raw materials trade; economics of export restrictions as applied to industrial raw materials; effects of removing export taxes on steel and steel-related raw materials; disciplines on export restrictions in regional trade agreements; increasing the transparency of export restrictions; and mineral resource policies for growth and development.

Governments give many reasons for imposing such export restrictions, including: to increase their tax revenues; to support domestic industries’ ‘value added’; to stabilise prices; to improve income redistribution; and to protect resources and the environment.

This increased use of export restrictions on raw materials over the last decade has forced other governments and stakeholders to look closely at their raw materials supply in order to determine the adverse effects of these restrictions and to propose alternative policies to governments, as well as to seek greater controls on the use of such restrictions.

Among those stakeholders to speak at the conference, BIR environmental & technical director Ross Bartley explained the key concerns of the scrap community, encompassing scrap collectors, sorters and processors.

In contrast to mineral resources that other speakers explained were owned by countries, Bartley pointed out that scrap was commonly owned by companies (in the case of new scrap) or individuals (in the case of post-consumer scrap).

He used an example from South Africa to show that the intention when placing export restrictions on waste and scrap was to provide downstream industries such as metal works with cheap infeed. He also explained the harm inflicted on environmental policies by export restrictions on processed scrap.

Those attending the conference heard arguments for and against export restrictions, including alternatives to them. One expert observed that, while the WTO rule book provides a framework for dealing with raw materials, regional trade agreements, WTO+ and WTO- can address restrictions directly. Others observed that more immediate benefits would come from a strengthened co-operation between governments.

BIR believes that dissuading governments from imposing or keeping their export restrictions on waste and scrap may take some time if direct economic pressure is not applied by their trading partners.

For more information, visit: www.bir.org

Don't hesitate to contact us to share your input and ideas. Subscribe to the magazine or (free) newsletter.

You might find this interesting too

Romania’s multi-million investment powers green energy
Departing EuRIC frontman Katrakis joins Galloo
Plastic recyclers are going strong

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe now and get a full year for just €169 (normal rate is €225) Subscribe