Revised EPR will cut business costs, says Brussels

Simplified regimes for extended producer responsibility (EPR) in Europe are being promised in a package of measures to cut red tape for businesses.

Currently, EU-based companies must appoint an authorised representative to fulfil their EPR obligations in every Member State where they are not established but sell products. This requirement is included in legislation for batteries, packaging, electronic equipment, single-use plastic and waste.
The European Commission is promising to suspend this obligation for European producers while further streamlining EPR schemes under the upcoming Circular Economy Act.

Hazardous database repeal

The Commission is also proposing to repeal the Substances of Concern in Products (SCIP) database on hazardous substances, saying the cost to business is disproportionately high. Following a planned amendment to the Waste Framework Directive, SCIP will be replaced with ‘more effective digital solutions’ such as the Digital Product Passport and implementation of the One Substance One Assessment package.
Additionally, the Circular Economy Act, scheduled for 2026, will deliver simpler, harmonised rules and lower costs for cross-border circular activities.

Packaging waste review

By presenting the package of measures – known as the environmental Omnibus – the Commission says it is ‘committed to continuing to exploit the full potential for simplification, stress testing EU legislation and working on effective implementation’. It goes on: ‘For example, to ensure a smooth and timely transition of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulations, the Commission is due to publish guidance soon to provide further clarity and harmonised implementation on issues raised in the call for evidence.’The EC estimates this latest proposal will save businesses approximately EUR 1 billion per year. The proposals will now be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council for adoption.

Among the first organisations to react has been Zero Waste Europe. While acknowledging that reducing administrative burden can be beneficial, it says a broad simplification risks sending the wrong signals when it comes to circularity.