MEPs back recycled plastic content in ELVs

MEPs back recycled plastic content in ELVs featured image

The European Parliament has called for a minimum 20% of recycled plastic in new vehicles under the proposed European Commission (EC) regulation for vehicle design and the management of end-of-life vehicles (ELVs).

MEPs want the 20% to apply within six years of the rules’ entry into force. This will be increased to 25% within 10 years, if enough recycled plastic is available at ‘non-excessive’ prices.

The targets are similar to those proposed by the EC: the ELV regulation sets a three-stage target of 15% by six years, 20% by eight years, and 25% by ten years. MEPs also want the EC to introduce targets for recycled steel and aluminium and its alloys, following a planned feasibility study.

EPR

Under the proposed regulation, new vehicles would be designed to allow the easy removal of parts and components by authorised treatment facilities, with a view to their replacement, reuse, recycling, remanufacturing or refurbishing, where technically possible.

Three years after the entry into force of the new rules, manufacturers would have extended producer responsibility (EPR) requiring them to cover the cost of the collection and treatment of ELVs.

MEPs want a better distinction between used vehicles and end-of-life vehicles, with an export ban for those that are considered end-of-life vehicles. The rules will apply to all except for special-purpose vehicles, those designed and built for use by the armed forces, civil defence, fire and emergency medical services. Another exemption includes vehicles of historical and special cultural interest.

‘Realistic targets

The draft measures were backed by 431 MEPs with 145 against and 76 abstentions. Negotiations with the EC and European Council are expected to start soon.

Co-rapporteurs Jens Gieseke and Paulius Saudargas said: ‘Parliament supports the circular economy in the automotive sector. We are advancing resource security, protecting the environment, and ensuring sustainability. To avoid overburdening the industry, we secured realistic targets and ensured less red tape and fair competition.’

Don't hesitate to contact us to share your input and ideas. Subscribe to the magazine or (free) newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe now and get a full digital year for just €123,50 Subscribe